Connect with us

Hoosiers Football

Nebraska Cornhuskers vs. Indiana Hoosiers: Preview, Predictions and Prognostications

Published

on

When: Oct. 15, 2016; 3:30pm ET
Where: Bloomington, Ind.; Memorial Stadium (52,929)
TV: ABC
All-Time Series: Indiana leads 9-7-3
Last Meeting: Nebraska Won 69-17 (Sept. 30, 1978)
Line: Nebraska (-4)

Who knew this game would mean so much to divisional races when the first nine-game schedules were announced? Yet, here we are and the Hoosiers and Huskers get together for the first time in nearly 40 years with both programs needing a win.

Nebraska needs this to help solidify its recently found top 10 status, while the Hoosiers need this to show that tough play against good opponents can turn in to wins. After finding a way to beat Michigan State, the Hoosiers found ways to beat themselves and eventually lost this past week to Ohio State.

This is the third straight big game for the Hoosiers, so perhaps that atmosphere won’t be overwhelming at all. Meanwhile, the Huskers play a massive Big Ten on the road for the second time this year. The first time ended well, as Nebraska took the battle of the NU’s in Evanston.

If either team wants to be relevant to the Big Ten division races in November, it will need this win.

 

1 Burning Question: Which Richard Lagow Shows Up for Indiana

It is becoming clear that IU’s offense, and the results of this team, will only go as far as the arm of quarterback Richard Lagow will take them. He has been wildly inconsistent at times, but also highly effective as well.

The question really is which version show sup on Saturday. Is it the 5-interception throwing QB from the Wake Forest loss? Perhaps it is the 61 percent completion rate, 276-yard throwing QB that showed up in the win over Michigan State?

Or will it be the Richard Lagow that completed just 50 percent of his passes for 182 yards, 2 touchdowns and 1 interception against Ohio State this past weekend?

Clearly there are a lot of sides to the junior college transfer, and it may depend on what the Nebraska defense throws his way. The bad news for Lagow and Co. is that Nebraska’s defense has been a tricky one for opposing teams to solve.

The Huskers give up just 17.6 points per game and haven’t given up more than 17 points to anyone not named Oregon this season. Cracking that nut is going to be tough, and it is going to rest largely on the shoulders and right arm of Lagow.

2 Key Stats:

— 6. That is the number of points Nebraska has allowed opponents to score in the 4th quarter. As we’ve talked about, solving that 17-point barrier is going to be the key challenge for Indiana. If the Hoosiers want to get a victory here, they are likely going to need points in the final quarter, as the Huskers have a 78-6 advantage in points scored during the fourth quarter. That includes a 21-0 margin in a comeback win over Illinois two weeks ago.

— 293.0. That is the number of passing yards Indiana’s offense puts up per game. It also happens to be the best passing attack in the Big Ten and the 26th-best mark in the country through the air. Combine that with Devine Redding’s impressive start to the 2016 season and IU has the most potent offense in the Big Ten. Nebraska has passed a few challenges from teams who like to air it out, holding both Illinois and Oregon to 146 yards through the air. Can they stack up to the multiple threats IU can put out there in the receiving game?

3 Key Players:

Terrell Newby, Nebraska RB: The Huskers have struggled to figure out an option that can lead this team in the backfield. Counting on quarterback Tommy Armstrong to be the all-everything option won’t work well long-term for this season and it appeared that the Huskers may have found a good rushing complement to Armstrong in Newby. He put up a season-high 140 yards and two touchdowns in the win over Illinois two weeks ago. That was on the heels of a good complementary 62-yard performance against Northwestern the week before. If the Huskers want to survive a brutal back half of the season, Newby has to be an option teams actually worry about.

Rashard Fant, Indiana CB: We’ve talked a ton about the high-powered Hoosiers passing attack, but Nebraska is no slouch in the passing game either. It may be one of the few teams that can match receiving threats with IU in the Big Ten, including names like Jordan Westerkamp, Stanley Morgan Jr. and Alonzo Moore to name a few. That means the pressure could be on a player like Fant to be at his best. The good news for Hoosiers fans is that Fant has been up to the challenge all season long really. He has nearly as many passes defensed (8) as he does tackles (9) and owns an interception on the season. Look for his play to be key to Indiana’s overall defensive effort on the day.

Nathan Gerry, Nebraska S: Secondary play is going to be huge in this contest, so we’re also going to highlight one half of perhaps the most productive safety group in the Big Ten. Gerry has been a known quantity for some time, but has really let it all hang out this season. He’s second on the team in tackles (29) and is second on the team in tackles for loss (5), all while also tied for the team lead in interceptions (2) and owning the passes defensed lead (4). You can’t ask for much more from a safety, and Gerry will need to continue making those big plays in this game if the Huskers want to slow down the Big Ten’s best passing attack.

4 Staff Predictions:

Andy: Nebraska 31-17
Dave: Nebraska 28-20
Phil H.: Indiana 31-27
Philip R-R.: Nebraska 31-24
Zach: Nebraska 35-28

Andy Coppens is the Founder and Publisher of Talking10. He's a member of the Football Writers Association of America (FWAA) and has been covering college sports in some capacity since 2008. You can follow him on Twitter @AndyOnFootball

Continue Reading
Comments

Hoosiers Football

Indiana Hoosiers 2018 Season Review: The good, the bad and the ugly

Published

on

The bowl games are known, the College Football Playoff committee continues to screw with the Big Ten and programs across the country are in reflection mode. 

So, we’ll join them in taking a look back at the 2018 season in-depth. That starts with an honest assessment of the good, the bad and the ugly that took place this year. 

Previous Recaps: Wisconsin Badgers | Illinois Fighting Illini

For the Indiana Hoosiers, there’s no bowl game like many were thinking would happen. So, that means the time for reflection in certainly now. 

What happened to a season many thought would see the Hoosiers head to a bowl game? A disappointing 5-7 campaign is what happened and we’ll try to get to the bottom of the why here for you. 

The Good

Stevie Scott. 

Need we say more? Probably not, but let us expound on the breakout star of the season for the Hoosiers. 

Scott finished the year 4th in the Big Ten in rushing, racking up 1,137 yards on 228 carries with 10 rushing touchdowns to his name as well. 

Just how vital was Scott to the Hoosiers success? His 228 carries were the second-most of any running back in the Big Ten this year. Imagine where Indiana would be without him? It’s a frightening thought. 

The Bad

Indiana’s next step can’t come without a better defensive performance. This was supposed to be the strength of the head coach, but you can make a really solid argument that since becoming the head man the defense has taken a turn for the worse. 

No example of that is better than the lack of production from the Hoosiers pass defense. 

Indiana finished 11th in the Big Ten in pass defense, giving up an average of 240.6 yards per game. That’s a massive drop from last season, were IU was 4th in the Big Ten last year in passing defense, giving up just 179.7 yards per game. 

You may be able to chalk some of it up to players who were off to the NFL or the real world thanks to graduation, but this is a program that should be building enough depth to sustain a loss or two at any position. Losing one Rashad Fant shouldn’t mean the entire group gives way. 

This was also a pass defense that gave up a B1G-worst 27 passing touchdowns to just 13 interceptions on the season. Something has to change here given the pass-happy offenses that permeate the Big Ten East division these days. 

The Ugly

Earlier on we mentioned the name Stevie Scott. One could argue he was the only good piece of news for this offense in 2018. 

Ignore the fact that Indiana’s pass game was third in the conference by the numbers (and yes, I’m a numbers guy). Were those numbers because of pure quality or quantity? Indiana also finished third in the B1G in passing attempts on the year as well. 

The Hoosiers also complied just 257.8 yards per game through the air with Peyton Ramsey at quarterback. Indiana was also third in the league in passing offense last season, but averaged just about 10 yards per game more. 

In fact, the analytical numbers bare the fact that it was really the run game that was the difference this year. With a solid run game, the Hoosiers offense went from 98th to 72nd in the country in S&P+ offensive rankings. 

While Ramsey threw for more than 2,800 yards this year, he also had a touchdown to interception ratio of 19 to 13 — not exactly killing it. 

It is a bit baffling because it isn’t like there is a dearth of talent at wide receiver or anything. Names like Simmie Cobbs and Nick Westbrook are quality receivers that most teams would love to have in the mix. 

Neither of those names were the one to lead the team in receptions either and only one of the teams receivers finished in the top 10 of the conference in receptions and that was Luke Timian, who had 46 receptions for just 422 yards and not a single touchdown. 

That should tell you all you need to know about how misleading the passing game stats were for the Hoosiers in 2018. 

Growth from the passing game is needed if this offense and this team want to get back to a bowl game. We’ll see if they have that ability in 2019, as it’s a make-or-break year for head coach Tom Allen. 

 *all stats courtesy of CFBstats.com unless otherwise noted.

Continue Reading

Hoosiers Football

Predicting the 2018 Indiana Hoosiers season game-by-game

Published

on

As the 2018 college football season enters the first real week, it’s time to lay everything on the line for the Indiana Hoosiers. For us at talking10 that means it’s time to go game-by-game and give you how we see the season playing out.

The annual tradition continues, but with a new twist. This year we’re going video format as we re-launch our YouTube page. So, how does our talking10 kingpin, Andrew Coppens, see the 2018 Indiana Hoosiers season playing out? 

Let’s take a look: 

Don’t forget to subscribe to the talking10 YouTube page. We’ll have video breakdowns and commentary all throughout the 2018 football season. You don’t want to miss it. 

Continue Reading

Football

Can Illinois or Indiana’s QB change spark either program?

Published

on

We’ve nearly hit the halfway point for some teams in the Big Ten, and that means time for plenty of reflection. Two programs have done plenty of that over the past week, as both Illinois and Indiana have gone in different directions with their starting quarterbacks.

Earlier this week, Illinois announced that Jeff George Jr. would be the starter. It was a move few didn’t see coming given the anemic production of the Illini offense with Chayce Crouch at quarterback.

Indiana wasn’t far behind, as head coach Tom Allen revealed redshirt freshman Peyton Ramsey would become the sole quarterback to play going forward. It ended four weeks of a two-quarterback system in place.

Both decisions seems smart on paper, but which one will make the biggest impact on their team?

Case For Peyton Ramsey:

Sometimes you win the job out of necessity and some times you win the job because you’ve outplayed everyone else. For me, the latter is true for Ramsey.

One of the most undertold stories of this season has been Indiana’s struggles in the pass game. Everyone saw them carve up Ohio State’s defense for over a half and assumed all was good. Well, Lagow has been ineffective and Ramsey has added a different dimension to an offense trying to find an identity.

To date, Ramsey has split time with Lagow in four games. He’s completed 60.4 percent of his pass (besting Lagow’s 56.3 mark) for 316 yards (6.6 yards per attempt, compared to 6.4 for Lagow). In just 48 attempts this season, Ramsey has equaled Lagow’s TD number at 4, while throwing just one interception.

Throws like this one to Simmie Cobbs for an 18-yard TD is the spark and kind of performance Ramsey can produce:

With an offensive line in flux, Lagow’s immobility has shown to be a big issue. He’s got the arm, but it really isn’t any good when you are under pressure and can’t move? Lagow’s got minus-30 yards on the season, meanwhile Ramsey is second on the team with 117 yards on 34 carries in his limited time on the field. That’s good production for a team searching to get back to the wild offensive numbers they are used to putting up.

A spark is needed, but so is consistency more than anything. Ramsey provides both and for a Hoosiers team that has a ton of talent around him, this should be the calming influence needed to help this team get to a bowl game.

That’s especially the case when you notice how Allen and his teammates respond to his mentality on and off the field.

“It’s more collective. It was really just this game. It was more of a buildup over time,” Allen said earlier this week, via Indiana’s Scout website. “We love both guys, awesome people. … There’s just a grit to (Ramsey), a toughness to him. He’s got a linebacker mentality to how he works.”

Case for Jeff George Jr.:

Illinois is in the middle of a youth movement on both sides of the

George also isn’t a first time starter. He played starter last season, being inserted in to the toughest of road situations possible — a freshman on the road at Michigan. That experience can be helpful for sure, and something George Jr. brought up in talking to the media this week.

“I’m excited to go out there and try to make something happen and try to get this offense rolling. I think I can do my part,” George Jr. said, via IlliniInquirer. “I feel like I know how tough it is to win a game. We went through some ups and some downs last year and now nothing is new.”

There’s also the fact that it did seem as if his connection with the likes of Malik Turner, Mike Dudek and Co. was better than Crouch’s was.

Look, something had to happen, because with Crouch at QB the Illini offense became as one-dimensional as Minnesota’s offense often was with Mitch Leidner behind center the past two years. It didn’t work well for the Gophers, and with a defense still figuring out who it is for the Illini, that would’ve been disastrous the rest of the way.

This is also a great opportunity to showcase George Jr. against the toughest of competition. He’ll go up against a schedule that includes Northwestern, Ohio State and Wisconsin still to go.

Head coach Love Smith seems to be going with a sink or swim mentality to this team — pushing younger players to the brink to see if they respond or fold. Putting George out there as the starter the rest of the way is more of that, and it may be that the rest of his teammates respond to that idea more than they did with Crouch.

Final Verdict: Peyton Ramsey

This one is easy for me. Ramsey has more weapons to work with in the form of wide receivers like Simmie Cobbs and Luke Timian in the fold. He also has a decent running back in freshman Morgan Elison, who is averaging 5.8 yards per carry and has 310 yards in four games so far this season.

As for Jeff George Jr.? Sure, he’s got the same freshman running back with potential as Indiana does, but he’s not set up for success like Ramsey is. Mike Dudek is a weapon and Malik Turner can be good…but Turner has also been inconsistent to say the least.

George also has a bigger body of work, and that body of work suggests a pretty average quarterback at best. He’s completing just 43.1 percent of his passes for 681 yards and five touchdowns to seven interceptions in five games played in his career.

Call me crazy, but those numbers don’t inspire me.

Let’s see who can play better, but if there’s someone who has already shown the ability to succeed under pressure, that has been Ramsey. I’ll take his numbers, situation and moxie over George any day of the week.

Continue Reading

Buckeyes Football

Indiana Hoosiers vs. Ohio State Buckeyes Preview: Welcome to the Big Ten in Week 1

The 2017 season kicks off with a Big Ten matchup for the first time in years. Join us as we preview the Buckeyes vs. Hoosiers.

Published

on

J.T. Barrett, Ohio STate Buckeyes

When: Thurs., Aug. 31; 8pm ET
Where: Bloomington, Ind.; Memorial Stadium (52,929)
TV: ESPN
All-Time Series: Ohio State leads 72-12-5
Last Meeting: Ohio State win 38-17 (2016)

 

Welcome officially to the 2017 college football season my fellow Big Ten nuts out there. There couldn’t be a more perfect way to start the season than by hitting the ground running with some B1G football, and that is exactly what we get on Thursday night as the Ohio State Buckeyes and Indiana Hoosiers collide in Bloomington, Ind.

This game may not be a marquee matchup, but it is a Big Ten game and there are plenty of storylines all around this one. We’ve got ex-Indiana head coach turned Ohio State co-offensive coordinator Kevin Wilson against his old team. We’ve got two quarterbacks with a lot to prove entering their senior seasons and a whole cast of new characters on the Buckeyes sideline.

We’ll start to get answers to a lot of big questions, but let’s kick our preview off with a look at the most burning question entering this game.

1 Burning Question: What offenses will we really see?

Indiana and Ohio State provide plenty of intrigue, you know, with the whole Kevin Wilson as co-OC vs. his old team and all that. But, the biggest question burning in my mind is just what both offenses will actually look like in Week 1.

Will the Hoosiers keep the offense that Wilson laid the foundation for or will we see some wrinkles? What about Wilson’s influence on Urban Meyer’s power-run version of the spread offense. That isn’t exactly Wilson’s cup of tea and it appears that the passing game is going to be critical to success for the Buckeyes in 2017.

So, if you’re watching this game, keep a close on just how different or not these offenses are for the 2016 versions we saw. Whichever one either adjusts best or executes the old version best is likely to come away the winner on Thursday night.

2 Key Stats

21: That is Ohio State’s current winning streak against the Hoosiers. 

Ohio State has beaten up on a lot of teams over the years, but few have been beaten up as bad as the Hoosiers have been. Even with the resurgences of the IU program to respectability, it hasn’t changed the fact that they can’t seem to beat the Buckeyes ever. Indiana’s last win in the series came back in 1988, a 41-7 beat down of the Buckeyes. Why is that relevant to this game? Well, that win also took place in Bloomington, Ind. and a 21-game win streak is long for anyone, including the Buckeyes.

152.2: That was Indiana’s rushing average per game in 2016.

It also happens to be a low-water mark for a program that became one of the Big Ten’s best rushing attacks over the course of the previous three seasons. Last season showed that the depth that was once there had become depleted. Even with 1,000-yard rusher Devine Redding in the mix, the Hoosiers slipped to 11th in the Big Ten in rushing. While the passing attack will always get the big attention, the silent and deadly run game needs to return in Bloomington for the Hoosiers to have success.

 

3 Key Players

Mike Majette, RB (Indiana): Why is a guy you’ve likely never heard of so vital to the cause for the Hoosiers? Well, one of the best-kept secrets to the Hoosiers rise under Kevin Wilson was the ability of the run game. From 2013 to 2015, the Hoosiers ranked no worse that fourth in the Big Ten in rushing offense. Last season saw a dramatic falloff as Jordan Howard left for the NFL draft and the Hoosiers were just 11th in the Big Ten in rushing. Majette played in just eight games, but put up a healthy 4.6 yards per carry in his sophomore season. If the Hoosiers want to win tonight, Majette needs to be a star and right now, that is a big question mark.

J.T. Barrett, QB (Ohio State): If you would’ve told me that we haven’t seen J.T. Barrett win a Heisman Trophy following his freshman season, I would’ve thought you were crazy. Yet, Barrett hasn’t lived up to the potential shown in his first season. Now, we have Barrett working with a new offensive coordinator and quarterbacks coach. All the talk this offseason has been how Barrett can improve as a pocket passer and as a true dual-threat quarterback. Will Wilson’s influence on the offense be a spark for Barrett or has he hit a ceiling? With Indiana’s improving defense, he will be tested tonight.

Damon Arnette, CB (Ohio State): Sometimes there is nothing like being thrown in to the deep end of the pool. While Arnette got game action in his freshman season — making 21 tackles and picking off one ball — there’s a difference between being a bit player and “the guy.” Arnette steps in to starters role for the first time and he’ll likely have the biggest test of the season going against quality names like Simmie Cobbs, Nick Westbrook and Donavan Hale. Can he pass this test early on? If not, it could be dangerous news for the Buckeyes hopes in 2017.

B1G Prediction:

The Buckeyes defensive line is scary good, but the rest of the team is a bit suspect in terms of experience heading in to the opener. While there is a ton of potential and recruiting talent, let’s see it on the field. Personally, I believe the OSU defense has a scare put in to them for the first half of the game at the very least. It wouldn’t surprise me to see the Hoosiers putting up 17 points in the first half before being shut down after adjustments are made at halftime.

This will be best Memorial Stadium atmosphere ever: Perhaps atmosphere and Memorial Stadium in Bloomington, Ind. don’t always go hand-in-hand (unless you’re talking about one of the worst in the Big Ten).

Score: Ohio State 34, Indiana 17 (Listen here for more on the game).

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

talking10 Podcast

Advertisement

Most Popular

Copyright © 2018 talking10.com. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed or sponsored by the Big Ten Conference. It is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only and is no way associated with the NCAA, the Big Ten or any member institutions.