Another season, another December and January sitting on the couch watching other teams play in bowl games. Indiana fans, coaches and most players certainly would like to forget the pain that was the 2014 season.
Head coach Kevin Wilson looked to change things up on defense by hiring a new defensive coordinator in Brian Knorr. Specializing in the 3-4 defense at Wake Forest, Knorr would have a rough time transitioning an already bad defense in to a scheme that required speed and depth.
That’s exactly what happened…well that and all-important quarterback Nate Sudfeld going down. So, despite the 4-7 finish to the season, could there actually be optimism heading in to this new one?
Let’s take a look back at 2014 for the Hoosiers, before we move forward.
After a few years of searching, Indiana found a run game to speak of. Junior running back Tevin Coleman had bubbled under the surface as a potential breakout player in the past few seasons, but given the Hoosiers pass-happy offense it wasn’t likely he’d be a star.
Instead, Coleman made big play after big play and made the offense work around him and became exactly that. He finished the season as one of two running backs to over the 2,000-yard mark in the Big Ten and nationally. The other was Heisman Trophy candidate Melvin Gordon of Wisconsin.
Coleman finished with 2,038 yards on 270 carries and averaged the same 7.4 yards per carry as Gordon did. He also had 15 touchdowns on a team that eventually was a one-man offense — and Coleman was that offense.
That’s what makes what he did so impressive, everyone and anyone on that field knew the only thing you had to do to beat Indiana was stop Coleman and keep your own offense flowing. Not many teams did that, as Coleman topped 100 yards in 11 of 12 games and had four games of 200-plus yards.
Maybe no game was as impressive as what he did to Ohio State’s defense — tearing it up for 228 yards and three touchdowns (tying a season best in that mark).
Now, if only a passing game could’ve complemented Coleman…man that IU offense would’ve been scary good in 2014.
One could easily point the finger at the defensive side of the football or injuries as the bad part of the 2014 season for the Hoosiers. However, a seven-game losing streak in Big Ten play qualifies as bad.
It especially qualifies as bad when Indiana was making so much progress in conference play in previous seasons.
Wilson’s team had major issues that helped contribute, one of which we’ll explore coming up. But, there’s no doubt that the defense still wasn’t good enough. This was a group that despite a transition year still finished last in conference play in scoring defense (36.0 points) and passing defense (242.8 yards per game). It also was 13th in B1G play in total defense (451.6 yards per game).
Not exactly the turnaround that was hoped for by switching to the 3-4 defense of new coordinator Brian Knorr.
One could argue the defense also didn’t get much in the way of help for an offense that averaged just 18.9 points per game in Big Ten play. That argument is certainly part of the picture, but so is the lack of experience and talent.
Luckily, some of that young talent Wilson and Knorr were able to recruit heading in to last season stood up to the test of a full season as freshmen and should be better able to help turn things around in year two.
What Indiana does in year two of the 3-4 defense under Knorr is going to be key to 2015’s success, but certainly things can’t keep on the track they have been under Wilson’s direction as the head coach or he’ll be out of a job in December at the latest.
Quarterback health, or a lackthereof was the ugliest part of a season that was rather forgettable. One was left wondering what would’ve happened had a healthy Nate Sudfeld been at QB alongside a record-setting season by Coleman.
Talk about a scary offense, huh? Instead, the only thing that was scary (and thus ugly) was the play of backup quarterbacks thrown to the wolves completely unprepared for what was to come. Let’s just say it wasn’t a coincidence that Sudfeld was behind center for three of IU’s four wins in 2014.
With Sudfeld out early in game six of the season, the reigns were turned over to freshmen Chris Covington and Zander Diamont. The later got most of the action, but was clearly in over his head as a passer and leader in his true freshman season. Diamont finished 2014 completing just 48.5 percent of his passes for 515 yards and just one touchdown in 132 attempts.
Given the Hoosiers’ need to get a passing game to go for its offense to be successful (and of course the team by proxy), Sudfeld’s loss underscored how young this team was and how unprepared this group was. Part of that is on the coaching staff, but let’s also not forget the Hoosiers lost Sudfeld’s biggest competitor for starting minutes, Tre Roberson, to transfer.
It was a scenario that led to Sudfeld’s health being paramount and it didn’t play out the way Wilson and Co. were hoping. Perhaps the group is better for the trails and tribulations of 2014, but IU better hope Sudfeld doesn’t repeat history in 2015 or it could be another long year.
Archie Miller not afraid to set aggressive tone at Indiana
There is no doubt that new Indiana Hoosiers men’s basketball head coach Archie Miller has high expectations to live up to. Athletic director Fred Glass’ firing of Tom Crean and rational for it made those expectations very clear.
Miller wasn’t afraid to set his own tone for how to meet said expectations. He did so in just one word — aggressive.
That aggressiveness should be easy to see the second Miller’s team steps on the floor for the first time in the 2017-18 season. He made that much clear in his introductory press conference.
“I think the more we’re on the run in the full court and the half court, which means a lot of movement and a lot of pace,” Miller said. “I think our teams at Dayton were known for great ball movement, unselfishness.
“But I told these guys, it’s going to be pace, it’s going to be player movement, flow, and it’s going to be an attacking, aggressive style.”
Miller will want his team to be aggressive, and so was the process of his hire.
A seven-year deal that will doll out $3.35 million a year certainly highlights just how serious Indiana is about getting back to being one of the bluebloods of college basketball.
“I see him as a 20-year guy that is our guy, and will create his own era here at Indiana University,” Glass said, via the Indianapolis Star. “The son of a coach, coaching family, brother at a big-time program … he sees the opportunity as I see it. He’s embracing high expectations.”
Miller’s words also indicate just how serious he is about that ideal as well.
It is also clear that Miller gets what it will take to be successful at Indiana, mainly everyone involved with the program pulling in one direction. From outreach to former players, to making current players feel comfortable in the new style, and making Bloomington, Ind. a destination for the best of the best of the future of basketball — Miller already has a plan in his mind.
Executing that plan will be key to any success Miller and Co. will have at the helm of the Hoosiers basketball program. It will start with the embrace of the former players.
“We’re going to approach our program — I think Fred and I discussed this probably more so than anything, we’re going to approach the program on three levels, and those three levels are going to really be embraced and attacked very hard,” said Miller in his introductory press conference.
“The first level is obviously our past. Every player, every former coach, every former manager that laid the groundwork for this place to be what it is today, we owe them a lot, and our effort level and our give-back has to be really unmatched, and they have to feel that they’re a part of everything that we do, and our players have to feel that power. That’s something we are going to really fight hard for.”
He also made it very clear how aggressive he is going to be in recruiting the state of Indiana and the Big Ten footprint. While others have talked about it, Miller is setting his sights on getting the best players the state has to offer to come on board like they haven’t been.
“The last part of the level, the third level, is the future,” said Miller. “And the future is the recruiting. And we’re going to have a great way about us, and the term that we’ll use is called inside-out. We have to start inside this state of Indiana, and we have to start moving outside very slowly, because the footprint is there.”
“The inside-out approach means that we have to dedicate ourselves to the high school coaches in this state, the high school talent in this state, the grass-roots programs in this state, and they must feel like they’re being dominated by Indiana University. You’re not going to get every player; you understand that.
“But if we want them, we should have a great chance of getting them because of the commitment level that we’re putting forth 24 hours a day at home.”
Betting against a coach with the success he has had and the pedigree of his coaching blood isn’t a smart move. At least he’s willing to embrace high expectations and not dampen the thirst for a national championship-caliber program once again.
Kevin Wilson speaks on being fired from Indiana Hoosiers for first time
2017 has to feel a little strange for Kevin Wilson. After all, he went from Indiana Hoosiers head coach to co-offensive coordinator at Ohio State. Same conference, same division, just a different color scheme.
However, up until this weekend, Wilson has stayed silent on his “resignation” from the Hoosiers head coaching position. Wilson finally opened up a bit following one of Ohio State’s spring practices.
After avoiding the questions about IU, Wilson finally cracked when asked about the treatment of players and rumors of what went on at Indiana.
“We wouldn’t be here doing this job if those things were true,” Wilson said, via CoachingSearch.com. “Anyone can have an opinion. I know the department looked at everything. I know this school’s looked at everything. I know we’re very comfortable with what we’re doing, where we’re at, and we’re excited moving forward.”
Ohio State certainly seemed comfortable, vetting Wilson and his background hard before making him the co-offensive coordinator in January.
It was a good six-year run in Bloomington for Wilson, who went 26-47 overall but led the team to back-to-back bowl berths the last two seasons.
One of the biggest questions surrounding Wilson’s firing was the rumor of intimidation of athletic trainers. Wilson was rather emphatic in his response to a question about that very topic.
“Those guys handled all the decisions. I used to get ridiculed when Tevin Coleman would come out of a game. Those guys ran the ship. They did a great job. You take a losing program and have that kind of success, that’s a great commitment from a lot of people. Those guys were awesome.”
Wilson also pointed out that his relationship with most players at IU was a good one. Any questions about that were put to rest with a story about one of his ex-players from Indiana.
“I got a message from (an IU) kid the other night who was going through a situation, just said, ‘Hey, I appreciate everything you did. You made me tough as nails, and I love you,’” Wilson said.
Indiana may not have been comfortable enough to move on with Wilson, but it certainly seems as if Ohio State is more than comfortable having him lead the offense this season.
Now that the questions have largely been answered, perhaps the media in Columbus can get on to the task of asking questions about the actual 2017 Buckeyes football team.
2017 talking10 Big Ten Men’s Basketball Awards Special
The Big Ten may have its awards, but what is the point of watching endless hours of Big Ten basketball without putting our two cents in, right?
Welcome to the 2017 taking10 Big Ten Men’s Basketball Awards special. Our hope is to educate you on the names that dominated our conversations and the hardwood across the Big Ten this season.
So, sit back and enjoy our special for your viewing pleasure.
Way too early look at 2017 Indiana Hoosiers football
The 2017 offseason is certainly going to be different in Bloomington, Ind. After all, there was an unexpected change at the top of the program and all. With Kevin Wilson ousted for “philispohical differences,” defensive coordinator Tom Allen has been elevated to the head coaching position.
Obviously change is afoot at the top of the program, but there are significant changes to the depth chart as well. Some of the biggest names in recent program history are off to potential NFL futures and that means recruiting will sink or swim Allen’s first year at the helm.
It also means 2017 could be a mystery for one of the most hard-to-read programs in the Big Ten.
Previous Previews: Wisconsin |
How does all of it add up for the 2017 Indiana Hoosiers football season?
Burning Question: Can Tom Allen Continue the Defensive Transformation?
The secret to Indiana’s success in 2016 was a vastly improved defense. Sure, some may be able to argue there was nowhere to go but up. The reality was, this program didn’t just go up defensively, it actually was able to win games because, not in spite of, the defense.
It is also likely the reason Tom Allen is now the Hoosiers head coach. However, 2017 is going to be a very different season than the first under Allen thanks to some key parts that will be gone for this upcoming season.
That means Allen must find some answers up the middle with the loss of tackle Ralph Green III and linebacker Marcus Oliver. It also means that some younger players who stepped up in 2016 must continue to play at that level or continue to rise.
In all, it may be asking a lot to expect this defense to continue its rise
Biggest Strength: Linebacker
Losing Marcus Oliver hurts, as he was one of the most productive tacklers in the Big Ten. But, the linebacker position is loaded with talent and Oliver’s loss may not be as big of a deal as some are making it out to be.
A lot of that comes from the fact that Tegray Scales decided to come back for his senior season in Bloomington. Scales has been as productive as Oliver, just in a different way throughout his career. After all, Scales led all Big Ten players with 126 tackles last season. He also put up a crazy 23.5 tackles for loss and 7.0 sacks…not to mention an interception for a pick-six as well.
Scales comes in to the 2017 season as a favorite for Big Ten Linebacker of the Year, and in a 4-2-5 system like the one Allen plays, having one outstanding linebacker is huge.
However, the reason for this being Indiana’s biggest strength is the fact that fellow soon-to-be Senior, Chris Covington, will be next to him. In a limited role, Covington showed promise with 29 tackles, 3.0 tackles for loss and 2.0 sacks in 2016. His role will vastly expand in 2017 and that is a good thing.
So is the fact that Indiana has loaded up on linebackers period over the past few years thanks to a switch to the 3-4 defense just a few years ago. There is depth as well as top-line talent at linebacker for the first time in a long time in Bloomington.
Biggest Weakness: Running Back
If there is a reason to worry about the Hoosiers offense without Kevin Wilson it lies in a very uncertain future in the run game. With Devine Redding off to the NFL a year early, what should’ve been a great situation turns in to a complete unknown.
The Hoosiers rusher for 1,929 yards as a team last season and Redding accounted for 1,122 of those yards. Also gone is the second leading rusher, former quarterback Zander Diamont, who rushed for 244 yards. It leaves soon-to-be sophomore Tyler Natee as the leading returning rusher with just 237 yards and two touchdowns on the season.
In fact, he is the only returning running back with a touchdown to his name on the Hoosiers roster. But, come November, Natee was buried on the depth chart and is likely a situational running back at best given his stature.
We’ll more likely see soon-to-be junior Mike Majette and soon-to-be sophomore Devonte Williams battling it out in spring for the starting job. Are either of them ready to step up to the plate in 2017? The two combined for just 87 carries for just 347 yards last season.
After years of players like Tevin Coleman, D’Angelo Roberts and Jordan Howard in the mix, the 2017 season is certainly an unknown at a position that has been the secret to Indiana’s offensive success.
Let’s just say there are more questions than answers at running back heading in to 2017.
Players to Watch This Offseason:
Richard Lagow, QB:
Few players are as physically intriguing and hard for opposing defenses to prepare for as Lagow is. He’s tall and built like a brick house, but he can also scare you with his overall athletic ability.
However, his first season in Bloomington was an up and down one. He finished last season completing just 57.8 percent of his passes and threw 19 touchdowns to 17 interceptions. Lagow also threw for a ridiculous 3,362 yards despite those previous numbers.
That was likely a product of Wilson’s pass-happy offense, but the overall numbers suggest plenty of room for improvement for the senior quarterback. Can he take this offseason and become a deadly quarterback? He likely won’t have the steady run game he had last season to bail him out at times and he also needs to stay healthy.
Chris Covington, LB:
We talked a bit about Covington before, as he is likely to step in to a starting role for his final season in Bloomington. However, that isn’t a guarantee given the competition that existed at the position before. Let’s see if Covington can live up to expectations as a potential starter or if the competition will get to him. I’m guessing he’ll handle it just fine and emerge from the spring as one of the players everyone is talking about.
Simon Stepaniak, C: One of the areas that is of the biggest concern for the Hoosiers this offseason has to be its offensive line situation. Gone are stalwarts like Dan Feeney and Wes Rodgers. The latter will likely be replaced by soon-to-be sophomore Simon Stepaniak, who was his backup as a redshirt freshman last season. Can Indiana entrust a young offensive line to a player like Stepaniak? Answering that question is going to be a key point to this offseason on the offensive side of the football. Getting a solid anchor in the middle of the line is going to be needed with all the changes around the center as well. Stepaniak has a bright future if you believe the coaching staff from last season, let’s see if that solidifies in spring.
Indiana is coming off of back-to-back bowl game appearances. It is a huge milestone for a program that has struggled mightily to even make single bowl game appearances. However, everything is different for this team in 2017 given all that is gone.
Can this team find a running game given the losses at running back and up the middle of the offensive line? Will the secondary continue to grow and surprise people as a unit? Can Richard Lagow become more accurate of a passer with so many of his weapons from last season also gone?
If those questions aren’t all answered in the affirmative, it could be a dip below .500. Then again, getting Illinois and Purdue as cross-division games is certainly helpful.
Let’s just say there is a lot of unknown for a program that has historically struggled to maintain success.